
Did you know
89 minutes exactly — the "classic feature" runtime most directors aim for.

"Calvin Fuller is about to break curfew...by 1500 years."
A Southern California kid named Calvin Fuller is magically transported to the medieval kingdom of Camelot through a crack in the ground caused by an earthquake. Once there, he learns he was summoned by the wizard Merlin, who needs Calvin to save Camelot. Using dazzling modern inventions, can Calvin help King Arthur retain his crown and thwart the evil Lord Belasco?
“Calvin Fuller is about to break curfew...by 1500 years.”

Thomas Ian Nicholas
Calvin Fuller

Joss Ackland
King Arthur

Art Malik
Lord Belasco

Daniel Craig
Master Kane

Kate Winslet
Princess Sarah

Paloma Baeza
Princess Katey
David Tysall
Ratan

Ron Moody
Merlin
Credits
Want more? Switch to Cinephile mode in the header for DP, composer, budget, box office, production companies, keywords, and release history.
Did you know?
Cinephile deep dive
Michael Gottlieb directs. Elemér Ragályi behind the camera. J.A.C. Redford scores. Anita Brandt-Burgoyne cuts. Runs lean at under 100 minutes. Produced in United States of America. Dialogue in English.
Trivia
Part of
Calvin Fuller's time travel adventures in "A Kid in King Arthur's Court" and "A Kid in Aladdin's Palace".
Also by
Stills · wallpapers
Full-resolution frames — open one to save it as a wallpaper.
Trailers & featurettes
Community reviews
Dreadful film. Everything about <em>'A Kid in King Arthur’s Court'</em> is just so poor, the whole feel of the film is extremely low-budget and limp. The writing is substandard, while the dialogue is actually terrible; it forces the 'present day vs. old days' theme way too much, it needed more to it. The casting can make such a difference in how your film comes out, you can have a load of crap but if you get a strong cast you can still produce something good. This simply doesn't do that, though there is an interesting caveat - as both Kate Winslet and Daniel Craig incredibly appear, in just their third and second films respectively - huge credit to the Hubbards & Co., the UK casting directors. The premise is just so dumb and uninteresting. Disney already adapted the Mark Twain novel in 1979 with <em>'Unidentified Flying Oddball'</em>, which I didn't love, so it's bizarre they chose to go back to it. As noted earlier, they try to make it noteworthy by colliding the two differing eras but it just comes across as lazy. There's one, very minor, part I did like and that was King Arthur's little story with the Excalibur sword. It's nothing amazing, but I could appreciate what they were trying to do with that at the very least. Entirely forgettable, one of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995; from the ones I've seen to date, which is the majority, it's in my bottom six in fact.
Production companies

Trimark Pictures
US

Walt Disney Pictures
US
Tapestry Films
US
Themes & keywords
Release history · US
Also known as