2073

"This is a warning"

2024 1h 23m EN

👍

6.7

SOLID

★6.7TMDB · 143

ThrillerScience FictionDrama

Synopsis

Spoiler shield

Inspired by Chris Marker's iconic 1962 featurette La Jetée; the year is 2073—a not-so-distant dystopian future—and the setting is New San Francisco, the scorched-earth tech-dominant police state where democracy and personal freedom have been well and truly obliterated.

“This is a warning”

WhatsApp X Facebook Telegram

Where to watch · US

HBO Max Amazon ChannelSubscription

Amazon VideoRent

Apple TV StoreRent

Google Play MoviesRent

Google Play MoviesBuy

YouTubeBuy

Fandango At HomeBuy

Cast

Samantha Morton
Ghost
Naomi Ackie
Professor
Hector Hewer
Jack

Credits

Behind the camera

Director: Asif Kapadia
Writers: Asif Kapadia, Tony Grisoni, Temple Clark
Languages: English
Countries: United Kingdom, United States of America

Want more? Switch to Cinephile mode in the header for DP, composer, budget, box office, production companies, keywords, and release history.

Did you know?

Fun facts 🍿

1 / 8

RUNTIME

Did you know

83 minutes exactly — the "classic feature" runtime most directors aim for.

MoodPlayr · trivia#01

2 / 8

ERA

Did you know

Released 2 years ago.

MoodPlayr · trivia#02

3 / 8

WORLD

Did you know

International production across 2 countries: United Kingdom, United States of America.

MoodPlayr · trivia#03

4 / 8

DIRECTOR

Did you know

Directed by Asif Kapadia, shot by Bradford Young. Note their partnership — DPs and directors often return to each other across a career.

MoodPlayr · trivia#04

5 / 8

DIRECTOR

Did you know

Editor Chris King shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.

MoodPlayr · trivia#05

6 / 8

CAST

Did you know

Samantha Morton and Naomi Ackie and Hector Hewer carry the top of the cast.

MoodPlayr · trivia#06

7 / 8

FACT

Did you know

Marketing tagline: "This is a warning".

MoodPlayr · trivia#07

8 / 8

WILD

Did you know

IMDB entry: tt22042346 — still the authoritative cross-reference for credits and trivia.

MoodPlayr · trivia#08

Cinephile deep dive

The take

Asif Kapadia directs. Bradford Young behind the camera. Chris King cuts. Runs lean at under 100 minutes. Produced in United Kingdom, United States of America. Dialogue in English.

Trivia

Things worth knowing

183 minutes exactly — the "classic feature" runtime most directors aim for.
2Released 2 years ago.
3International production across 2 countries: United Kingdom, United States of America.
4Directed by Asif Kapadia, shot by Bradford Young. Note their partnership — DPs and directors often return to each other across a career.
5Editor Chris King shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.
6Samantha Morton and Naomi Ackie and Hector Hewer carry the top of the cast.
7Marketing tagline: "This is a warning".
8IMDB entry: tt22042346 — still the authoritative cross-reference for credits and trivia.

The technical file

Cinematography: Bradford Young
Editing: Chris King
Costume design: Verity May Lane
Makeup / hair: Jenny Rhodes
Sound: Manav Kher
Runtime: 83 min · 1h 23m
Aspect ratio (typical): 1.37:1 (Academy)
Status: Released
Box office: $7,125
Original language: EN
Certification (US): R
IMDB: 2073 (2024)

Also by

Asif Kapadia

Stills · wallpapers

Selected frames

Full-resolution frames — open one to save it as a wallpaper.

Wallpaper

Trailers & featurettes

Watch the pieces

Community reviews

What people are saying

misubisu2026-05-02
Score: 6/10 — A Visceral, Uneven, and Deeply Frustrating Warning Shot Asif Kapadia, the director behind masterful documentaries like Amy and Senna, takes a sharp left turn with 2073. This is not a straightforward documentary. It's a hybrid—what Kapadia dubs "speculative non-fiction"—that intercuts a fictional dystopian narrative with real archival footage and interviews to argue that we are sleepwalking toward catastrophe . The ambition is admirable, the craft is often stunning, and Samantha Morton delivers a heartbreaking performance with almost no dialogue. Yet the film ultimately frustrates as much as it haunts, earning a 6/10 for its noble intentions and undeniable power, weighed down by a structural messiness and a lack of narrative payoff. What Works: The Mood, The Performance, The Warning The fictional thread of 2073 follows a mute woman named "Ghost" (Samantha Morton) living in the ruins of San Francisco after an undefined "Event" in the 2030s . She hides in a decaying mall, scavenging and writing her memories as a warning to the past, while surveillance drones and military police hunt survivors. It's bleak, claustrophobic, and visually arresting. Morton is extraordinary. She communicates decades of grief, rage, and desperate hope through nothing but her eyes and posture . The future she inhabits, a totalitarian tech dominant police state where billionaires rule and the rest scavenge is rendered with an effective, low fi eeriness. The film's engine, however, is its use of real footage: protests, police brutality, climate disasters, data mining scandals, and clips of tech billionaires and world leaders. The message is hammered home with force; the seeds of 2073 are being sown right now, and we are not doing enough to stop it. For viewers who feel overwhelmed by the news cycle, the experience is like "doomscrolling: the movie" relentless, anxiety inducing, and designed to jolt you awake. Why It's a 6 (The Frustrations) 2073 is a film that has its moments, but the whole is less than the sum of its ambitious parts. The core problem is the awkward marriage of its two halves: 1. The Documentary Bleeds Out the Narrative: The fascinating dystopian premise with Ghost is constantly interrupted by lengthy montages of real-world news clips. It feels less like a cohesive film and more like a video essay interrupted by a movie or vice versa. By the time we return to Ghost, the emotional momentum has dissipated. 2. Preaching to the Choir: The film's politics are unapologetically left leaning, targeting Trump, Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and authoritarian leaders like Putin and Modi. For viewers who already agree, it can feel like an exhausting, 85 minute lecture without new insights. For those who disagree, it will be easily dismissed as propaganda . 3. All Warning, No Compass: The film is exceptional at diagnosing the disease but offers no prescription. It leaves the audience feeling not empowered to act, but paralysed by despair which, while perhaps intentional, makes for a deeply unsatisfying cinematic experience. The Verdict: 2073 is less traditional entertainment and more of an urgent, anxious essay. If you view it as a feature length op ed designed to make you put down your phone and worry about the future, it succeeds brilliantly. If you want a coherent story, character arcs, or a glimmer of hope, you will be disappointed. Watch if: You are fascinated by hybrid documentary/fiction forms, appreciate Samantha Morton's acting, or want a cinematic representation of the anxiety you feel scrolling through the news. Skip if: You need a traditional narrative structure, dislike political polemics, or are currently feeling overwhelmed by the state of the world and need escapism rather than a mirror.

Production companies