2000 Mules

"They thought we’d never find out. They were wrong."

2022 1h 26m EN

😐

5.9

MID

★5.9TMDB · 47

Documentary

Synopsis

Spoiler shield

Bestselling author and award-winning filmmaker, Dinesh D’Souza, exposes widespread coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group, True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of ten trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of professional operatives, called mules, delivering fraudulent votes to mail-in boxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence obtained from official surveillance cameras corroborates the cellular positioning data. The film concludes by exploring ways to assist in the prevention of election fraud in future democratic elections.

“They thought we’d never find out. They were wrong.”

WhatsApp X Facebook Telegram

Cast

Dinesh D'Souza
Self / Narrator
Catherine Engelbrecht
Self
Larry Elder
Self
Eric Metaxas
Self
Sebastian Gorka
Self
Dennis Prager
Self
Debbie D'Souza
Self
Gregg Phillips
Self

Credits

Behind the camera

Director: Dinesh D'Souza
Writers: Dinesh D'Souza, Debbie D'Souza, Bruce Schooley
Languages: English
Countries: United States of America

Want more? Switch to Cinephile mode in the header for DP, composer, budget, box office, production companies, keywords, and release history.

Did you know?

Fun facts 🍿

1 / 8

RUNTIME

Did you know

86 minutes exactly — the "classic feature" runtime most directors aim for.

MoodPlayr · trivia#01

2 / 8

MONEY

Did you know

Earned back only 29% of its budget on initial theatrical — a commercial disappointment on release.

MoodPlayr · trivia#02

3 / 8

ERA

Did you know

Released 4 years ago.

MoodPlayr · trivia#03

4 / 8

DIRECTOR

Did you know

Original score by Bryan E. Miller. Worth a dedicated listen after — most great films lose half their impact without the score.

MoodPlayr · trivia#04

5 / 8

DIRECTOR

Did you know

Editor Dinesh D'Souza shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.

MoodPlayr · trivia#05

6 / 8

CAST

Did you know

Dinesh D'Souza and Catherine Engelbrecht and Larry Elder carry the top of the cast.

MoodPlayr · trivia#06

7 / 8

FACT

Did you know

Marketing tagline: "They thought we’d never find out. They were wrong.".

MoodPlayr · trivia#07

8 / 8

WILD

Did you know

IMDB entry: tt18924506 — still the authoritative cross-reference for credits and trivia.

MoodPlayr · trivia#08

Cinephile deep dive

The take

Dinesh D'Souza directs. Bryan E. Miller scores. Dinesh D'Souza cuts. Runs lean at under 100 minutes. A commercial under-performer on release. Produced in United States of America. Dialogue in English.

Trivia

Things worth knowing

186 minutes exactly — the "classic feature" runtime most directors aim for.
2Earned back only 29% of its budget on initial theatrical — a commercial disappointment on release.
3Released 4 years ago.
4Original score by Bryan E. Miller. Worth a dedicated listen after — most great films lose half their impact without the score.
5Editor Dinesh D'Souza shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.
6Dinesh D'Souza and Catherine Engelbrecht and Larry Elder carry the top of the cast.
7Marketing tagline: "They thought we’d never find out. They were wrong.".
8IMDB entry: tt18924506 — still the authoritative cross-reference for credits and trivia.
9Only 47 TMDB ratings — you're getting ahead of the curve on this one.

The technical file

Original score: Bryan E. Miller
Editing: Dinesh D'Souza
Production design: Bruce Schooley
Runtime: 86 min · 1h 26m
Aspect ratio (typical): 1.37:1 (Academy)
Status: Released
Budget: $5,000,000
Box office: $1,465,513
Return: 29% of budget
Original language: EN
Certification (US): NR
IMDB: 2000 Mules (2022)

Also by

Dinesh D'Souza

Stills · wallpapers

Selected frames

Full-resolution frames — open one to save it as a wallpaper.

Wallpaper

Trailers & featurettes

Watch the pieces

Community reviews

What people are saying

alexas2022-06-16
★ 1/10
Stop what you're doing right now. Go check FactCheck.org, Reuters, NPR, AP News, Washington Post, or any other fact-checker. EVERYTHING IN THIS FILM IS FALSE!!! GPS is not pinpoint accurate (anyone who has used Google Maps and seen their icon jump from block to block knows this). In court, it can only be used to identify you as being in a particular area. Ballot drop boxes are intentionally placed in high-traffic areas, like libraries, malls, or schools. In my case, it was across the street from the grocery store I walk to, right next to the library, perpendicular to a major road. Most people interviewed in this film refused to cooperate with independent fact-checkers. One that did attempted to show the GPS technique, only to be informed that his locations did not match up. At no point does this film show anything illegal. That begs the question: if the makers really did have proof of fraud, why didn't they submit it to the FBI, or even local authorities? (This is how 4 illegal votes for Trump were uncovered in the Florida villages) Seems kinda selfish that the makers would prioritize making money for themselves over bringing people to justice.
Adson682022-09-06
★ 10/10
A documentary showing one of the ways in which the 2020 US Presidential election was stolen, or "fortified" as it usually referred to by the perpetrators. This documentary shows how "mules" took advantage of unprotected dropboxes to flood the election with questionable ballots. It shows video footage and links that information to cellphone tracking to infer the routes travelled by the mules between dropboxes. The film features various prominent political commentators in conversation as they discuss the implications of the presented evidence. Of course, this documentary has been repeatedly attacked by propaganda outlets in a desperate attempt to stop people from seeing it. If you're a free-thinker, see it for yourself.
esoul2022-11-25
The producers do not understand how to show that their claim "voter fraud" is true. You need to have premises(established facts) that connect with each other to then support the claim. However in this movie the producers are lacking evidence to even create the needed premises. So they start guessing and basically say "There is just no other possibility if you see whats happening". Well.... in pre school this logic might work, but in real life, as soon as you say "It cannot be any other way, because I have no evidence" you make a fool of yourself. The movie is worthless. Try the courts with it... will be fun.