Mood.Playr
Sign in
Geek Charming poster

Geek Charming

2011 1h 38m EN
👍
6.7
SOLID
★6.7TMDB · 805
ComedyDramaRomanceFamilyTV Movie
Synopsis
Spoiler shield

Film geek Josh is looking for the subject of his new documentary when a chance meeting puts the perfect star in his sights—Dylan, his school's most popular junior. But Dylan's hopes of using the film to become Blossom Queen don't quite match with Josh's goal to make a hard-hitting exposé about popularity. Will Josh shoot the film as planned, or show Dylan as the truly interesting person she is?

“Some stories are better left unspoiled.”

Share

Cast

Credits

Behind the camera

Director
Jeffrey Hornaday
Writers
Hilary Galanoy, Elizabeth Hackett
Languages
English
Countries
United States of America

Want more? Switch to Cinephile mode in the header for DP, composer, budget, box office, production companies, keywords, and release history.

Did you know?

Fun facts 🍿

1 / 6
ERA

Did you know

Released 15 years ago.

MoodPlayr · trivia#01
2 / 6
DIRECTOR

Did you know

Directed by Jeffrey Hornaday, shot by Robert Brinkmann. Note their partnership — DPs and directors often return to each other across a career.

MoodPlayr · trivia#02
3 / 6
DIRECTOR

Did you know

Original score by Nathan Wang. Worth a dedicated listen after — most great films lose half their impact without the score.

MoodPlayr · trivia#03
4 / 6
DIRECTOR

Did you know

Editor David Finfer shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.

MoodPlayr · trivia#04
5 / 6
CAST

Did you know

Sarah Hyland and Matt Prokop and Vanessa Morgan carry the top of the cast.

MoodPlayr · trivia#05
6 / 6
WILD

Did you know

IMDB entry: tt1835977 — still the authoritative cross-reference for credits and trivia.

MoodPlayr · trivia#06

Cinephile deep dive

The take

Jeffrey Hornaday directs. Robert Brinkmann behind the camera. Nathan Wang scores. David Finfer cuts. Runs lean at under 100 minutes. Produced in United States of America. Dialogue in English.

Trivia

Things worth knowing

  • 1Released 15 years ago.
  • 2Directed by Jeffrey Hornaday, shot by Robert Brinkmann. Note their partnership — DPs and directors often return to each other across a career.
  • 3Original score by Nathan Wang. Worth a dedicated listen after — most great films lose half their impact without the score.
  • 4Editor David Finfer shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.
  • 5Sarah Hyland and Matt Prokop and Vanessa Morgan carry the top of the cast.
  • 6IMDB entry: tt1835977 — still the authoritative cross-reference for credits and trivia.
  • 7Classified under 8 themes, including "high school", "based on novel or book", "unlikely lovers", "documentary filmmaking".

The technical file

Cinematography
Robert Brinkmann
Original score
Nathan Wang
Editing
David Finfer
Production design
Chris August
Costume design
Rebekka Sorensen
VFX supervisor
Dan Schmit
Runtime
98 min · 1h 38m
Aspect ratio (typical)
1.37:1 (Academy)
Status
Released
Original language
EN
Certification (US)
PG

Also by

Jeffrey Hornaday

Stills · wallpapers

Selected frames

Full-resolution frames — open one to save it as a wallpaper.

Trailers & featurettes

Watch the pieces

Community reviews

What people are saying

  • Reno
    ★ 8/10

    Student film festival meets beauty pageant. I'm one of those guys who does not believe chick films are for girls alone, actions are for men, as well as magic films for kids. I watch them all, well, at least I admit that. So, not in my childhood, but overall I've seen many DCOM and I've liked many of them. This film came half a decade ago, I was aware of it, but only now I had watched it and it got me by surprise. I thought it would me another mean girl tale, that's where I was wrong. Well, in the initial few minutes, that's how it looked, but everything has changed since the beginning of the second act. That was the biggest plus point of this film. Even though predictable scenes, still it felt good enough. The character transformation, the way it was done was very smart. At one stage you hate, then a soft corner develops. It is a television film, but that's not how it looked. The quality of the story was like a theatrical film. If they had risked on that, they definitely would have succeeded. I would say a bad decision by the production house, but still the product delivered more than its expectation. The casting was good, All of them were new face to me, except Sasha Pieterse. Expecting a sequel for a good/successful film is so common with its fans. I thought about the same, but seems they are not interesting in one which was kind of confirmed in the end itself. Even though if they decide to make, it won't be as good as this one. Because the main story, all happened in here. Just like 'Taken' which is very powerful original film, not suitable for followups. This is a silly concept, but very nice film. I totally suggest it. 8/10

Production companies

Who made it

  • Mandeville Films

    Mandeville Films

    US

  • BA

    Bad Angels Productions, Ltd.

Key crew

  • Costume DesignRebekka Sorensen
  • Visual Effects SupervisorDan Schmit
  • Supervising Sound EditorMark Friedgen
  • ProducerTracey Jeffrey
  • Production DesignChris August
  • CastingNatalie Hart
  • Executive ProducerPaul E. Shapiro
  • CastingJason La Padura
  • NovelRobin Palmer
  • Executive ProducerDavid Hoberman
  • EditorDavid Finfer
  • Executive ProducerTodd Lieberman
  • Co-ProducerBrian Zeilinger-Goode

Themes & keywords

What it's about, really

  • high school
  • based on novel or book
  • unlikely lovers
  • documentary filmmaking
  • teenage romance
  • popular girl
  • based on young adult novel
  • film geek

Release history · US

When it landed

  • TV2011-11-11PG· Disney

Also known as

International titles

  • Bájos törtetőHU
  • Un chiflado encantadorES
  • Le Geek CharmantFR
  • nørdeprinsenDK
  • Το Πιο Γλυκό ΣπασικλάκιGR
  • Um Excêntrico EncantadorPT
  • Um Geek EncantadorBR
  • Прекрасний принцUA

More movies like this