Replicant

"A ruthless killer... to destroy him, they had to create him."

2001 1h 40m EN

😐

5.9

MID

🥫

27%

ROTTEN

⭐

5.4

IMDB

★5.9TMDB · 558🥫27%Rotten Tomatoes★5.4IMDB · 16,429

ActionScience FictionThriller

Synopsis

Spoiler shield

Scientists create a genetic clone of a serial killer in order to help catch the killer, teaming up with two cops.

“A ruthless killer... to destroy him, they had to create him.”

WhatsApp X Facebook Telegram

Where to watch · US

MovieSphere+ Amazon ChannelSubscription

Amazon VideoRent

Apple TV StoreRent

Google Play MoviesRent

Google Play MoviesBuy

YouTubeBuy

Fandango At HomeBuy

Cast

Jean-Claude Van Damme
Replicant / Garrotte
Michael Rooker
Jake
Catherine Dent
Angie
Ian Robison
Reisman
Pam Hyatt
Mrs. Riley
Marnie Alton
Hooker
Brandon James Olson
Danny
Allan Gray
Roarke

Credits

Behind the camera

Director: Ringo Lam Ling-Tung
Writers: Robert Pratt, Lawrence Riggins, Les Weldon
Languages: English
Countries: United States of America, Canada

Want more? Switch to Cinephile mode in the header for DP, composer, budget, box office, production companies, keywords, and release history.

Did you know?

Fun facts 🍿

1 / 8

MONEY

Did you know

Earned back only 5% of its budget on initial theatrical — a commercial disappointment on release.

MoodPlayr · trivia#01

2 / 8

ERA

Did you know

25 years old — old enough to be someone's favourite childhood film.

MoodPlayr · trivia#02

3 / 8

WORLD

Did you know

International production across 2 countries: United States of America, Canada.

MoodPlayr · trivia#03

4 / 8

CAST

Did you know

222+ people credited in cast and crew — a small city's worth of labour.

MoodPlayr · trivia#04

5 / 8

DIRECTOR

Did you know

Directed by Ringo Lam Ling-Tung, shot by Mike Southon. Note their partnership — DPs and directors often return to each other across a career.

MoodPlayr · trivia#05

6 / 8

ERA

Did you know

Original score by Guy Zerafa. Worth a dedicated listen after — most great films lose half their impact without the score.

MoodPlayr · trivia#06

7 / 8

DIRECTOR

Did you know

Editor David M. Richardson shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.

MoodPlayr · trivia#07

8 / 8

CAST

Did you know

Jean-Claude Van Damme and Michael Rooker and Catherine Dent carry the top of the cast.

MoodPlayr · trivia#08

Cinephile deep dive

The take

Ringo Lam Ling-Tung directs. Mike Southon behind the camera. Guy Zerafa scores. David M. Richardson cuts. A commercial under-performer on release. Produced in United States of America, Canada. Dialogue in English.

Trivia

Things worth knowing

1Earned back only 5% of its budget on initial theatrical — a commercial disappointment on release.
225 years old — old enough to be someone's favourite childhood film.
3International production across 2 countries: United States of America, Canada.
4222+ people credited in cast and crew — a small city's worth of labour.
5Directed by Ringo Lam Ling-Tung, shot by Mike Southon. Note their partnership — DPs and directors often return to each other across a career.
6Original score by Guy Zerafa. Worth a dedicated listen after — most great films lose half their impact without the score.
7Editor David M. Richardson shaped the rhythm. On an edit-heavy film, the editor does more to control your pulse than the director.
8Jean-Claude Van Damme and Michael Rooker and Catherine Dent carry the top of the cast.
9Marketing tagline: "A ruthless killer... to destroy him, they had to create him.".
10IMDB entry: tt0238552 — still the authoritative cross-reference for credits and trivia.
11Classified under 8 themes, including "police", "identity", "investigation", "biotechnology".
12Released under 13 different titles around the world.

The technical file

Cinematography: Mike Southon
Original score: Guy Zerafa
Editing: David M. Richardson
Production design: Andrew Neskoromny
Costume design: Antonia Bardon
Makeup / hair: Jessica Rain
VFX supervisor: Tom Turnbull
Sound: Jerry Gilbert
Runtime: 100 min · 1h 40m
Aspect ratio (typical): 1.37:1 (Academy)
Status: Released
Budget: $17,000,000
Box office: $894,844
Return: 5% of budget
Original language: EN
Certification (US): R
IMDB: Replicant (2001)
Rotten Tomatoes: 27% 🥫 Rotten
IMDB rating: 5.4/10 · 16,429 votes
MPAA: R

Awards

2 nominations total

Also by

Ringo Lam Ling-Tung

Stills · wallpapers

Selected frames

Full-resolution frames — open one to save it as a wallpaper.

Wallpaper

Trailers & featurettes

Watch the pieces

Community reviews

What people are saying

John Chard2015-02-12
★ 6/10
Double Trouble for Van Damme again! Yet another Jean-Claude Van Damme film that sees him tasked with playing two characters. In spite of its shaky reputation this isn’t half bad, it delivers what most Van Damme fans expect, namely bonkers fights and shifty science. Plot has Van Damme as a fire obsessed serial killer who is always one step ahead of the police. Enter science as a chance to clone the killer arises and this sets in motion the wheels of the Van Damme clone trying to come to terms with his alien world as he, and world weary police officer Jake Riley (Michael Rooker), set about capturing the unhinged mad man. It’s of course daft but it’s a whole bunch of fun, and with the strong presence of Rooker supplemented by two very interesting performances by Van Damme, pic is in good hands. The fight scenes are smoothly choreographed and exciting, with director Ringo Lam clearly aware of what makes a Van Damme movie work. It’s not prime Van Damme, but it’s above average and well worth checking out for those so inclined. 6/10
tmdb280390232022-09-04
★ 1/10
Jean-Claude Van Damme does the Italian neorealists one better; not only was he born to play himself, but also his twin — here, however, he mixes it up a bit, playing his clone instead. JCVD is Edward 'The Torch' Garrotte, a serial killer who likes to burn the corpses of the women he murders (why they gave him that last name but don’t have him use an actual garrotte, I haven’t the foggiest), whom Detective Jake Riley (Michael Rooker) has unsuccessfully pursued for the past three years — up to and including his last day on the force before retiring to apparently take up boat repairing. It turns out to be a 10 Minute Retirement; a secret government agency has cloned Garrotte from DNA found at a crime scene, and needs Jake's help to babysit the clone while he tracks down the killer — except they don’t call it a clone, but a "replicant". The difference between one and the other is never satisfactorily explained, but as far as I can tell, it takes at least a week for a replicant to be up and about ("God created man in six days, we took longer;" actually, God created man on the sixth day, not in six days. No wonder it took your ignorant asses longer). Additionally, while a clone has to grow and mature, a replicant comes out fully formed (complete, if my eyes don’t deceive me, with a navel), just like Pallas Athena from Zeus’ forehead — but then this is business as usual for clones in the movies, so I don't understand why this one feels the need to make a point out of its not being a clone. Unless, of course, director Ringo Lam deliberately wants us to think of Blade Runner (it's never a good idea to remind the audience that they could be watching a much better film; only instead of seeing "attack ships blazing from Orion's shoulder" and "C-beams glowing in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate,” JCVD eats dog food and falls in love with a whore. What’s certain is that the Replicant has the same muscular build as Garrotte; now, since a physique like JCVD's usually requires spending a lot in a gym — and time and a gym are two things that the Replicant lacks — I have no choice but to assume that Garrotte was born, like the baby in Meet the Spartans, with built-in muscles, a characteristic that his clone inherited (along with the uncontrollable desire to do splits). How do its creators intend for the Replicant to find Garrotte? “Well, we've augmented his telepathic ability by re-sequencing his genetic code from the genome. It may be our first, but genetic memory has been scientifically proven" — as has, I guess, telepathy, which is not the same thing; genetic memory would allow an individual to 'remember' something that they never learned (music, math), but the Replicator can recall specific actions performed by Garrotte. Anyway, the idea is for the Replicant to experience some sort of Proustian Madeleine moment, and it's Jake's job — who presumably knows Garotte as well as Steve Carell knows Proust in Little Miss Sunshine — to jog his memory. The rest is a disastrous hybrid of 48 Hrs. and Rain Man — the Replicant is basically a kid trapped in the body of a Belgian karate fighter (although come to think of it, so is the real JCVD) — that is neither good science fiction (the science, such as it is, being rather nebulous) nor good chopsocky (a character fighting himself invariably results in awkwardly choreographed action sequences). Then again, this movie was doomed they cast Michael 'Henry Lee Lucas' Rooker as the detective as opposed to the serial killer.